A Texas teen is
highlighting another aspect of choice with a court case against her parents, demanding the right to carry her pregnancy to term. R.E.K., 16,
won a restraining order
against her separated parents in an attempt to protect herself from
their attempts to coerce her to have an abortion, and the case has
attracted considerable attention in the media, because it touches on a
number of hot-button issues.
In conservative Texas, many pregnant women feel that abortion is not
an appropriate option for them even if they may have concerns about the
timing of the pregnancy. This teen isn’t the first, or the last, to
exercise her right to choose to carry her pregnancy and raise the baby,
rather than electing for abortion or adoption. Her parents, however,
didn’t support her decision, highlighting the power imbalance that can
arise between teens and their parents.
While parents are technically permitted to make medical decisions on
behalf of their children, most doctors prefer cooperative, engaged
patients who take part in the decision-making process. And when it comes
to abortion, courts have affirmed that parents do not have the right to
compel children to get abortions — or to force their children to carry
pregnancies to term — given that pregnancy is such an intimate and
emotional issue.
R.E.K. claimed her parents attempted emotional intimidation and
coercion, threatened to take her to a facility for an abortion against
her will, and conspired to slip her RU-486, a medication that causes
abortion in the early stages of pregnancy. If the allegations made in
the eight pages of documents are true, they make for a chilling story of
a teen struggling to go against her parents and do what she thinks is
right for herself.
She called on a conservative anti-choice organization, the Texas
Center for Defense of Life, for help with her case. The group has
successfully represented other teens in similar situations and appears
to be making headway with her case, using it as yet another promotional
opportunity for the work it does. And yet another chance to paint people
who support the right to choose with the same brush, suggesting that
all reproductive rights advocates would support forcing an abortion on a
young woman who doesn’t want one, or that doctors and other clinicians
would provide an abortion to an unwilling patient in violation of both
the law and medical ethics.
Particularly in Texas, where there are considerable barriers to
accessing abortion services, it’s highly unlikely her parents would have
succeeded in compelling her to have the procedure at all, but her fears
are understandable. For teens defying their parents with a major life
decision, it can be incredibly frightening to speak up.
She could easily have gone to a pro-choice organization for help as
well, and it’s telling that she chose the anti-choice route; in Texas,
as in many other regions of the world, the social understanding of the
reproductive rights movement is as a coathanger-armed crowd ready to
charge forth and murder innocent babies, which is a huge tragedy. Cases
like this should never happen, and young women who need support while
they decide how to handle a pregnancy should feel comfortable seeking
assistance from people with the resources to help them — like pro-choice
groups that offer prenatal care, counseling and assistance to pregnant
teens.