Thursday, May 30, 2013

Toddler's Sneaky Nighttime Behavior Surprises Parents


When Joann Moser's 8-year-old daughter complained that her 2-year-old brother was taking things from her room at night, Moser told her to just lock her bedroom door. Big sis did so, but things still went missing. As Moser recounted to HuffPost Parents, she and her husband found it hard to believe that their 2-year-old was able to take things from a locked room and set up a camera to solve the mystery. The resulting video, below, is both amazing and hilarious!
Read the whole story (The Huffington Post).
What's the sneakiest thing your child has ever done?

Alice in Chains Debut New Song, “Stone”


Alice In Chains’s new album, The Devil Put Dinosaurs Here, which is due out on May 28, is available for preorder on iTunes. Those who preorder it will receive an istant download new single music can receive an instant download of new single “Stone.” You can stream the song below; let us know what you think in the comments.
The band, who grace the cover of the new issue of Revolver magazine, will perform “Stone” April 10 on Jimmy Kimmel Live! “Stone” follows the album’s hugely successful first single “Hollow,” which hit No. 1 on both the Mainstream and Active Rock radio charts, while its companion video has amassed more than a million views on YouTube.

Monday, May 20, 2013

plz sign my petition

Tell SeaWorld: NO MORE CAPTIVE ORCAS; educate handlers

Tell SeaWorld: NO MORE CAPTIVE ORCAS; educate handlers
  • signatures: 1

  • signature goal: 1,000
Orcas are of the most highly social and intelligent creatures on the earth. In the wild they live w/their families and will have a special dialect between different families (pods). Captive orcas can become highly aggresive. The only 4 human "kills" by orcas have happened in captivity and one specific orca "Tilikum"; killed 3 out of the four. Yet, SeaWorld, knowing this orca had killed twice before, but SeaWorld still put him in the show and what is equivalent to that of a backyard pool. Tilikum now lives in a bathtub and SeaWorld is disobeying court order to no longer keep the handlers out of the water.
We cannot simply return orcas to the wild the other families will usually kill it or it does not have the social skills needed to survive in the water. Killer Whale sanctuaries are available. Orcas are at the top in the ocean just as we are on land; how is socially responsable to keep them in pools for human entertainment? It is not. WE NEED to Boycott SeaWorld and let them go ... m

24th Orca Dies at SeaWorld

24th Orca Dies at SeaWorld
The death toll at SeaWorld continues to rise as another captive orca dies unexpectedly at the park.
Kalina, a 25-year-old orca at SeaWorld Orlando, died suddenly of unknown causes two weeks ago. She is the fourth orca to die at a SeaWorld park in the past four months. In addition to Kalina, a male named Sumar died in September, and a pregnant female died while giving birth to a stillborn calf at the beginning of the summer.
Kalina was showing no signs of illness the day before her death, and died within hours of anyone noticing that she appeared in bad health. SeaWorld hasn’t released necropsy reports, but denies the conditions at the park are responsible for her death.
Orcas aren’t the only ones dying at SeaWorld parks. Orcas have killed trainers, as well as park trespassers foolish enough to climb into their tanks. Aggressive, violent behavior from a huge animal confined to a tiny chlorinated tank should not shock anyone. We as humans are incapable of understanding the frustration and stress these animals are under.
With the deaths of so many animals and humans over the past two and a half decades, you’d think SeaWorld would be coming to realize that not only is their enterprise inherently cruel and distasteful, but dangerous. But they aren’t.
SeaWorld continues its blanket denials of a connection between the recent deaths and continues to insist the orcas live in a man-made paradise. This is typical of zoos and circuses that exploit animals for human entertainment. To keep their customers pacified and supportive they assert their animals are pampered and well cared for, despite all evidence to the contrary.
SeaWorld’s history with orcas for the past 25 years is full of incidents like this. Twenty-four orcas have died in the past 25 years in addition to a handful of human deaths. SeaWorld has not been legally able to capture orcas in the wild since the early 70s when it used airplanes and explosives in one of its hunts.
Customers who pay admission to SeaWorld parks should know they are giving their money to a company that used explosives to capture wild animals until they had their license revoked. Customers should know that animals bred at, bought by, or loaned to SeaWorld parks are confined in tanks filled with chemically-treated water and fed an artificial diet. They are enormous intelligent animals with tight family bonds who are born with the instincts to roam free in open waters.
Every aspect of an animal’s existence at SeaWorld is stressful, frustrating, and unhealthy and it’s evidenced by the fact that all these animals are dying at half the age they would live to be in the wild. Despite the denials by SeaWorld executives and employees, the conditions in the parks themselves are what are killing these animals.
Animals do not exist for our entertainment any more than they exist for our consumption. Go vegan and boycott zoos, circuses, and all other industries that profit from animal exploitation.
TAKE ACTION: Tell SeaWorld Orcas belong in the wild!

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/24th-orca-dies-at-seaworld.html#ixzz2Ts0DSAHa

SeaWorld Rejects Federal Order To Protect Orca Handlers

SeaWorld Rejects Federal Order To Protect Orca Handlers
SeaWorld bills itself as an amusement park, but its business practices are anything but amusing. The company imprisons wild animals in cramped tank environments, forcing them to perform tricks for the entertainment of guests. But few members of the cheering audience realize there’s a dark side to the industry.
SeaWorld’s mascot is Shamu, a fictional orca. These massive creatures weren’t dubbed “killer whales” for nothing: they are capable of sudden, viscous attacks — a behavior that keeps them safe and well fed in the wild, but is viewed with horror when it occurs in our world.
In 2010, Tilikum, a captive orca at SeaWorld in Orlando, suddenly grabbed her trainer, Dawn Brancheau, shook her around like a rag doll, and pulled her under water, where she drowned. At the time, SeaWorld staff tried to claim that Tilly was playing, and didn’t know any better, but there are lots of good reasons to think that the attack was motivated by rage at her long-term imprisonment.
While animal rights advocates continue to fight for the release of orcas, dolphins and other marine creatures held captive by SeaWorld, a new disturbing detail of the saga has come to light.
An investigation by wildlife expert and Death At SeaWorld author David Kirby recently confirmed that SeaWorld is secretly fighting an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) ban on trainer/orca interaction during “Shamu” show segments.
In-water work–where trainers swim with, ride upon, and rocket from the powerful predators–with the orcas was declared a safety hazard and forbidden by OSHA in a citation issued by that agency after the tragic 2010 incident. The ruling was upheld by a federal judge and a Labor Department commission in late spring 2012, but like its continued disregard for animal safety, SeaWorld seems more concerned with losing money than protecting trainers.
Since the 2010 killing of Brancheau, SeaWorld “still allowed its trainers to keep in close contact with the whales—except Tilikum—during “dry work,” which is typically performed on stage or in special “slide out” areas, where trainers embrace, kiss and caress the animals,” writes Kirby.
In response, OSHA Chief inspector Lara Padgett issued a citation for SeaWorld’s “willfull” violations, writing that trainers were “exposed to struck-by and drowning hazards in that they were allowed to engage in ‘waterwork’ or ‘drywork,’ ” without proper protection. But still they continue. And now we find out that the powerful corporation is working behind closed doors to broker its own deal with the Agency.
The precise subject matter of the discussions was not disclosed, but a source close to the case—and documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act—indicate that SeaWorld wants to keep trainers in contact with the whales during certain “Shamu” show segments.
“The government’s position was strong,” Dr. David Duffus, the government’s expert witness at the Brancheau trial, told TakePark. “I hope OSHA won’t give any leeway on this. If they do, they will really be compromising trainer safety. Any time a killer whale can actually make contact with you, you are not safe. It is complete arrogance on SeaWorld’s part to suggest otherwise.”

Related Reading:
SeaWorld Orca Suffers Gruesome Injury–But How?
24th Orca Dies At SeaWorld
Why Are We Celebrating Birth of An Orca Whale At SeaWorld?


Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/seaworld-rejects-federal-order-to-protect-orca-handlers.html#ixzz2TrzsJVct

Check Out What Service Dogs Can Do

Check Out What Service Dogs Can Do
When Ben Ownby heads to the pool, he has a furry associate in tow: Dakota the dog, who actually follows Ben everywhere, including class and social events. Dakota’s not there for play, but to provide Ben with a vital service. He’s a diabetic alert dog who can tell when Ben’s blood sugar is too low or too high, and signals Ben to tell him to check his levels and take appropriate measures to get them under control. Ben, a type 1 diabetic, can’t rely on an insulin pump and monitor to help him manage his condition because of adhesive allergies, so he depends on Dakota to keep his diabetes at bay.
Meet the new breed of assistance animal. While you might think of guide dogs for blind and visually impaired people when you hear the term “assistance animal,” animals can actually be trained to perform a wide variety of tasks for their disabled partners, and the vast majority of assistance animals are dogs. (In fact, recently revised guidelines legally limit service animals to dogs and trained miniature horses.) These animals help their partners achieve independence, and come to play an important role in their lives.
Dakota is an example of a diabetic alert dog, a type of service animal that’s becoming more common as people take advantage of the fact that dogs can smell changes in blood sugar level. Dogs aren’t the only animals that can do this; Elijah the cat is equally capable of noticing changes in blood sugar levels and signaling them to his human. Service dogs can also help people with epilepsy and other seizure conditions, where a seizure dog can detect early warning signs of a seizure and provide assistance that can include fetching medication, pressing a button to summon assistance, rousing handlers and “blocking,” physically obstructing their handlers so they don’t accidentally fall down or enter a dangerous area (like the street).
Hearing dogs, meanwhile, help D/deaf and hard of hearing people by alerting them to audible cues in the environment that they can’t hear. Julia, for example, alerts her partner Janet to the doorbell, the teakettle, the alarm and other noises around the house so Janet can respond. Junior helps her partner Tanya by letting her know when the baby or another one of the children needs assistance, keeping an “ear,” so to speak, on the kids so Tanya knows they’re safe.
Psychiatric service dogs can help their handlers by performing a wide variety of tasks that help them manage their disabilities. These tasks are highly specialized, depending on the handler’s needs; for example, a PTSD dog might run through a home or room to “clear” it, checking for hazards, before her partner enters. PTSD dogs can also guide medical responders to a handler in crisis, bring medications, or keep handlers centered when they’re in a stressed state. Other psychiatric service dogs can remind handlers about medications, interrupt self-harming behaviors and perform related actions.
Mobility dogs can help stabilize people who have trouble walking independently, or pull wheelchairs for handlers who need assistance. Other assistance dogs fetch water bottles and other supplies on command to help their handlers, and can also perform tasks like turning lights on and off, opening doors, and more.
In all cases, service animals perform specific tasks to help a person with a disability, offering a service that the disabled person couldn’t perform independently. They aren’t pets, therapy animals, or emotional support animals, but working animals on the job, helping their owners retain independence and build confidence. The expansion of service animal handling and training to include a wide variety of disabilities in recent years has radically changed the scope of the landscape for disabled people.
It’s also created some issues, however. As service animals get more prominent, increased confusion about what they do and legal requirements when it comes to accommodating them has arisen. Legally, service animals must be accommodated as long as they are not disruptive (i.e. poorly-trained), and while their handlers can be asked about which tasks the animal performs, they are not required to provide documentation or discuss the nature of their disabilities. Service animals don’t need to be registered as such, and they aren’t required to wear special gear, although most do, simply to alert people to the fact that they’re on the job.
With more people using service animals, members of the public sometimes have misconceptions about their role. As working animals, they aren’t the same as pets and cannot be treated in the same way; handlers can’t be denied service for working with a service animal, for example, although a business can choose to turn away pets.
And service dogs aren’t for everyone. Some disabled people don’t need their services, and in some cases, this can become a source of tension, with dispute over whether a service dog is “really” needed that sometimes spills over into the courts. This has been especially common with autism service dogs, which some people argue can help autism children manage classroom environments, while others fear they are being used unnecessarily and promoted by for-profit organizations that might be exploiting concerned families. The truth, as is often the case, lies somewhere in the middle: some autistic children and adults undoubtedly benefit from having service dogs, while others do not, but still might enjoy the companionship of an animal friend, even if that animal doesn’t perform specific tasks.
People who encounter service dogs should remember that they are working and shouldn’t be distracted. Distractions can include pointing and staring, trying to interact with the dog (trust us, service dogs get plenty of snuggles when they’re off-duty!), or attempting to engage with the handler about the dog. In addition to being annoying for handlers who rapidly tire of such encounters, this can also break the dog’s focus, potentially endangering the handler.
The best thing you can do to support a service animal and her handler is ignore her, unless specifically invited to do otherwise, or unless you see a problem. Don’t be afraid to speak up if you see someone discriminating against a service animal and her handler: they have a legal right to access all the same places you do!
Related articles:
Pony Helps Blind Woman Attend College
12-year-old Epileptic Denied Service Dog in School
Norm’s Story: From Rescue to Service Dog

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/check-out-what-service-dogs-can-do.html#ixzz2TrzBpoxR

Kittens’ Eyes Sewn Shut to Research Treatment for Humans

Kittens’ Eyes Sewn Shut to Research Treatment for Humans
A new study of seven kittens suggests a new treatment for amblyopia or “lazy eye” in humans. The kittens did not themselves have the disorder (in which one eye works but the connections between it and the brain are disrupted). It was induced via a procedure called monocular deprivation, in which one of the eyelids of each kitten was sewn shut 30 days after birth, a critical period for the development of vision.
The kittens all, thankfully, regained their vision. That is, the proposed treatment for amyblopia — placing them in total darkness for ten days straight — was successful. While monocular deprivation “does no lasting harm to the kittens’ eyes or eyelids” according to NPR, the kittens did have to undergo painful procedures that are simply not be thinkable to carry out on humans.
In the experiment, a week after the surgery, the kittens’ eyes were reopened and they were found to be unable to see out of one eye. They were placed in total darkness, some right after having their eyes re-opened and others for five to eight weeks. The kittens who were immediately placed in the darkness regained their vision after seven weeks. But the others, whose “treatment” was delayed, regained their vision after five to seven days.
The Dalhousie University scientists who conducted the experiment attribute the kittens being able to get their eyesight back to their brains’ visual system being in an early stage of development. Young kittens have low levels of a protein called neurofilaments while older cats have more. Neurofilaments are described as”rigid scaffolding” in the brain and are thought to reduce its plasticity. Young kittens’ brains are therefore more able to adapt and change than those of adults.
Amblyopia in human children is now usually treated by placing a patch over the dominant eye, to make the “lazy eye” get stronger. There are side effects, such as the loss of depth perception and a weakening of the dominant eye. (Anecdotally, my late mother-in-law, sister-in-law and niece all had a lazy eye and wore a patch, with no lasting side effects.)
As NPR observes a bit tongue-in-cheekily, scientists emphasize that immersion-in-darkness as a potential treatment for lazy eye in humans is not even being considered and that “we shouldn’t start throwing children into the dark just yet.” The logistics — having a child stay in total darkness for a period of days — would certainly be complicated.
While it is a huge relief to know that the kittens in the experiment all regained their eyesight, it is an understatement to say that the study raises huge ethical questions. There is a need to study the brain and how it functions to develop new treatments. But knowing that kittens were deliberately blinded and placed in the dark for days to make new discoveries casts a shadow over the study and its findings.

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/kittens-eyes-sewn-shut-to-research-treatment-for-humans.html#ixzz2Tryol7Mo
Dear Jennifer,

UniverSoul Circus is planning to team up with infamous exhibitor Hugo "Tommy" Liebel and feature the suffering elephant Nosey in its upcoming performances in Tampa and Tallahassee this month, despite abundant indisputable evidence of Nosey's decades-long neglect at the hands of Liebel. Please join PETA in urging UniverSoul CEO Cedric Walker, Tampa Sports Authority President and CEO Eric Hart, and North Florida Fairgrounds Manager Mark Harvey to cancel Nosey's scheduled appearances in these upcoming shows immediately.

Liebel currently faces almost three dozen formal charges for violations of the federal Animal Welfare Act, most of them related to his abuse and neglect of Nosey. Despite these charges, Liebel continues to fail to give this elephant the care that she needs: Recent photographs of Nosey reveal that her condition continues to deteriorate and that she is in pain and suffering as a result. Click here to learn more about Liebel's unrelenting neglect of Nosey's health and well-being.

Please click here to urge Walker, Hart, and Harvey to make the prudent and compassionate decision to cancel Nosey's appearances immediately.

Please also forward this urgent information to your family and friends.

Thank you for your compassion.

Sincerely,



Delcianna Winders
Director of Captive Animal Law Enforcement
PETA Foundation
Jenni --

I wanted to make sure you didn't miss the important email I sent. Today fewer than 160 Florida panthers remain in the wild and as panther habitat becomes more and more fragmented, it will be increasingly difficult for these creatures to stay out of harm’s way. 
-- Elizabeth
Give Panthers a Brake
Give Panthers Room to Roam!
Florida Panther NPS
Fewer than 160 Florida panthers remain in the wild. Victims of shrinking habitat, panthers are increasingly vulnerable to a growing human presence.
Save Florida Pathers -- Take Action
Ask the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to Make Panthers a Top Priority!
Dear Jenni,
Beautiful, elusive, powerful – and critically endangered.
The Florida panther is one of the most endangered mammals on earth and the future of this subspecies is in our hands.
Florida panthers once prowled and flourished in America’s southeastern woodlands and swamps, but today, fewer than 160 of these majestic cats remain in a tiny portion of their historic range. And that habitat is shrinking every day – gobbled up by highway construction, subdivisions and commercial development.
In recent months, vehicle collisions between panthers and humans have taken a deadly turn. Vehicles are a leading cause of panther mortality – a total of 19 panthers were killed on Florida highways in 2012. That’s the highest recorded number of panthers killed by cars in a single year.
We’re in a race against time. As panther habitat becomes more and more fragmented, it will be increasingly difficult for these creatures to stay out of harm’s way.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service must prioritize efforts to create and expand wildlife refuges by obtaining and allocating funding and working with landowners to protect habitat that secures the Florida panthers’ future in the wild.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Fleming with a Panther Kitten Elizabeth Fleming
Florida Representative
Defenders of Wildlife

Exclusive: HIM Premiere New Song, “All Lips Go Blue”


HIM’s new album, Tears on Tape, will be released on April 30 on Razor & Tie in the United States and Canada. In anticipation, the band is premiering the new song “All Lips Go Blue” right here right now. Listen to it below and let us know what you think in the comments.
Tears on Tape is now available for pre-order on the iTunes Store in the United States. The iTunes Deluxe Digital Edition of the album includes a Digital LP plus five recently shot new in-studio music videos. See the full track list under the song stream.
The complete Tears on Tape Deluxe track listing is:
  1. Unleash The Red
  2. All Lips Go Blue
  3. Love Without Tears
  4. I Will Be The End Of You
  5. Tears On Tape
  6. Into The Night
  7. Hearts At War
  8. Trapped In Autumn
  9. No Love
  10. Drawn & Quartered
  11. Lucifer’s Chorale
  12. W.L.S.T.D.
  13. Kiss The Void
Bonus In-Studio Videos
  1. Heartkiller
  2. Wings Of A Butterfly
  3. Join Me (In Death)
  4. The Kiss Of Dawn
  5. The Funeral Of Hearts

Saturday, May 18, 2013

Black-footed Ferret Black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes) family group being prepared for release. Captive breeding facility, Colorado, USA
Once thought to be globally extinct, black-footed ferrets are making a comeback. For the last thirty years, concerted efforts from many state and federal agencies, zoos, Native American tribes, conservation organizations and private landowners have given black-footed ferrets a second chance for survival. Today, recovery efforts have helped restore the black-footed ferret population to nearly 1,000 animals across North America. Although great strides have been made to recover the black-footed ferret, habitat loss and disease remain key threats to this highly endangered species.
Ship in Arctic
Give Panthers a Brake
Give Panthers Room to Roam!
Florida Panther NPS
Fewer than 160 Florida Panthers remain in the wild. Victims of shrinking habitat, panthers are increasingly vulnerable to a growing human presence.
Save Florida Pathers -- Take Action
Ask the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to Make Panthers a Top Priority!
Dear Jenni,
Beautiful, elusive, powerful – and critically endangered.
The Florida panther is one of the most endangered mammals on earth and the future of this subspecies is in our hands.
Florida panthers once prowled and flourished in America’s southeastern woodlands and swamps, but today, fewer than 160 of these majestic cats remain in a tiny portion of their historic range. And that habitat is shrinking every day – gobbled up by highway construction, subdivisions and commercial development.
In recent months, vehicle collisions between panthers and humans have taken a deadly turn. Vehicles are a leading cause of panther mortality – a total of 19 panthers were killed on Florida highways in 2012. That’s the highest recorded number of panthers killed by cars in a single year.
We’re in a race against time. As panther habitat becomes more and more fragmented, it will be increasingly difficult for these creatures to stay out of harm’s way.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service must prioritize efforts to create and expand wildlife refuges by obtaining and allocating funding and working with landowners to protect habitat that secures the Florida panthers’ future in the wild.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Fleming with a Panther Kitten Elizabeth Fleming
Florida Representative
Defenders of Wildlife

Teen Sues for Right to Carry Her Pregnancy

Teen Sues for Right to Carry Her Pregnancy
A Texas teen is highlighting another aspect of choice with a court case against her parents, demanding the right to carry her pregnancy to term. R.E.K., 16, won a restraining order against her separated parents in an attempt to protect herself from their attempts to coerce her to have an abortion, and the case has attracted considerable attention in the media, because it touches on a number of hot-button issues.
In conservative Texas, many pregnant women feel that abortion is not an appropriate option for them even if they may have concerns about the timing of the pregnancy. This teen isn’t the first, or the last, to exercise her right to choose to carry her pregnancy and raise the baby, rather than electing for abortion or adoption. Her parents, however, didn’t support her decision, highlighting the power imbalance that can arise between teens and their parents.
While parents are technically permitted to make medical decisions on behalf of their children, most doctors prefer cooperative, engaged patients who take part in the decision-making process. And when it comes to abortion, courts have affirmed that parents do not have the right to compel children to get abortions — or to force their children to carry pregnancies to term — given that pregnancy is such an intimate and emotional issue.
R.E.K. claimed her parents attempted emotional intimidation and coercion, threatened to take her to a facility for an abortion against her will, and conspired to slip her RU-486, a medication that causes abortion in the early stages of pregnancy. If the allegations made in the eight pages of documents are true, they make for a chilling story of a teen struggling to go against her parents and do what she thinks is right for herself.
She called on a conservative anti-choice organization, the Texas Center for Defense of Life, for help with her case. The group has successfully represented other teens in similar situations and appears to be making headway with her case, using it as yet another promotional opportunity for the work it does. And yet another chance to paint people who support the right to choose with the same brush, suggesting that all reproductive rights advocates would support forcing an abortion on a young woman who doesn’t want one, or that doctors and other clinicians would provide an abortion to an unwilling patient in violation of both the law and medical ethics.
Particularly in Texas, where there are considerable barriers to accessing abortion services, it’s highly unlikely her parents would have succeeded in compelling her to have the procedure at all, but her fears are understandable. For teens defying their parents with a major life decision, it can be incredibly frightening to speak up.
She could easily have gone to a pro-choice organization for help as well, and it’s telling that she chose the anti-choice route; in Texas, as in many other regions of the world, the social understanding of the reproductive rights movement is as a coathanger-armed crowd ready to charge forth and murder innocent babies, which is a huge tragedy. Cases like this should never happen, and young women who need support while they decide how to handle a pregnancy should feel comfortable seeking assistance from people with the resources to help them — like pro-choice groups that offer prenatal care, counseling and assistance to pregnant teens.

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/teen-sues-for-right-to-carry-her-pregnancy.html#ixzz2Tfad1Wqd

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Mom Creates Must-See LEGO Hogwarts


What's the best toy you've ever given your kids? For Seattle mom Alice Finch it's a scale model of Hogwarts — made entirely by her from roughly 400,000 LEGO bricks!
The Huffington Post reports that Finch's LEGO structure, which was a year in the making, is not only accurate, but infinitely playable, with intricately detailed rooms and scenes from the books, including the feast in the Great Hall and the Gryffindor Common Room. Her must-see masterpiece is being hailed by Kotaku Australia as "the most impressive LEGO construction ever made by a single person."

Have your children reignited any of your own childhood interests?

Young Elephants Stolen from Families Sold into Chinese Cages

Young Elephants Stolen from Families Sold into Chinese Cages
The African elephant in this picture lives alone in freezing temperatures at Taiyuan Zoo in China.
People are kidnapping young elephants from a national reserve in Zimbabwe and shipping them to China to sell to zoos.
These people aren’t poachers. They are Zimbabwean government officials.
Zimbabwe’s national parks are hurting for money — they ”have been unable to pay the wages of employees the past few months,” and Chinese zoos “pay handsomely” for the young elephants. Nevertheless the parks authority “is understood to have been against the deal,” and government veterinarians who examined the Chinese zoos found them inadequate, according to The Scotsman. Zimbabwean president Robert Mugabe allegedly made a “covert deal” to sell the elephants to the Chinese.
The 36-hour trip to China is traumatic for the juvenile animals and sometimes kills them. One of four young elephants flown to China in November 2012 “died soon after its long and difficult journey,” the Global Post reports. “The elephants arrived in late November, during a winter of record cold temperatures.”
After that death, activists lobbied Zimbabwe’s government not to ship off another five calves whom authorities had already captured. The activists succeeded in persuading officials to release the five youth back into the wild, though by that time their families could not be found. Instead they “will undergo ‘rehabilitation and integration’” with other herds, according to Fox News.
So far Chinese zoos have paid for eight elephants, and Johnny Rodrigues, chairman of the Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force, says that when attention to this scandal dies down, Zimbabwe will send the outstanding animals. “The rest of the order will be shipped,” as The Global Post put it.
The Chinese and some activists have said that the elephants sent to China were not kidnapped from their families but orphaned in a local drought, The Scotsman reports. Other activists say the animals were not orphans. The Scotsman also claims that the national reserve from which the elephants were taken is carrying “twice its capacity” of elephants “with devastating effects on the terrain.” This is questionable since, as National Geographic reports, “some African elephant populations” are endangered.”
The elephants already sent to China, who are estimated to be 3-4 years old, face a bleak fate. Barren concrete cells enclosed by metal bars are cold comfort to young animals who have just been ripped away from their families and homes.
Stealing these elephants from their mothers and families and shipping them off to zoos isn’t ethical, says Dave Neale, director of animal welfare for the Animals Asia Foundation. ”Removing a highly intelligent, social animal from its family group and wild habitat to be shipped to another country and placed inside a concrete cell cannot be justified.” He called the practice “morally repugnant.”
Chairman of the Zimbabwe National SPCA Ed Lanca agreed: this “is basically kidnapping.”
Even Dr. Ian Player, a man who himself has been involved in sending rhinoceroses to zoos, condemned this project. “The sale of animals to destinations where it is known the animals will not be properly cared for, and facilities that are inadequate, is absolutely and morally wrong,” he said, according to Africa Geographic Blog.
This trade with China may be illegal. All Africa states that the “international body responsible for issuing trade permits for endangered species,” CITES, “went against its own regulations” in approving this transaction. Those regulations “prohibit licensing the sale of endangered species for commercial purposes.”
CITES regulations also prohibit “risk of injury, damage to health and cruel treatment” to endangered animals. All Africa argues that the Chinese are violating this regulation because the imported elephants are “being kept alone in unfamiliar surroundings” and the “temperature in their new home is much colder than the African climate they were born in.” There is some speculation that it was the cold, perhaps combined with the arduous journey to China, that killed the one elephant calf.
Dave Neale, however, says that though he strongly opposed the sale, it was legal and not in violation of CITES regulations.
Rodrigues has harsh words for CITES that would explain how the body could have issued permits for the kidnapping and sale of these young elephants into such wretched conditions: “there is a lot of greed and somebody is either being paid off or it’s just things that don’t make sense to me and it’s disgusting.”
The Scotsman reports “fears the elephants may be bred for ivory.”
Please sign our petition to CITES asking that governing body to revoke the permits that permit this travesty to continue.

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/young-elephants-stolen-from-families-sold-into-chinese-cages.html#ixzz2TOtMoRHf

Saturday, May 11, 2013

A sea lion sick with pneumonia receives medical care and a second chance at life.

February 21, 2013 - update
Duzzy is now back in the ocean after a month stay at our hospital. Beachgoers enjoyed seeing him waddle his way to the water's edge at Rodeo Beach in Sausalito on February 20. View the slideshow and video below to see Duzzy's return to the wild.

February 12, 2013 - update
We received good news about Duzzy! He had a second set of x-rays and the radiology report confirms that his lungs are now clear of pneumonia! We are optimistic he will go home to the wild soon. Meanwhile he still needs rest and to gain a bit more weigh at our hospital. He is currently eating 18.5 lbs of fish a day - make a donation to feed duzzy!
Scroll down for Duzzy's full story to date and a slideshow of his x-rays...


February 8, 2013
Duzzy, a wild California sea lion, didn't look healthy when rescuers from The Marine Mammal Center first found him on January 19, 2013.
Duzzy didn't look healthy when rescuers first found him on January 19, 2013.
© Petra Mottishaw. The Marine Mammal Center.


When a 230 lb sea lion is lying in the sand allowing people to approach him, it’s a sure sign that he doesn’t feel well. That’s just how rescuers from The Marine Mammal Center found Duzzy at Marina State Beach on January 19, 2013. When he was brought to the Center’s hospital, it was apparent that he was also severely underweight, as his spine and other bones were visible.

Center veterinarians performed an initial exam and learned that Duzzy's lungs were very congested. In fact, the lack of breath sounds was so severe, they questioned whether the stethoscope was working correctly!

Duzzy was immediately prescribed a strong antibiotic to combat bacterial pneumonia, but in order to make sure he didn’t have other serious problems, full body x-rays, an ultrasound, and blood tests were ordered. Watch this slideshow of Duzzy getting x-rays.

We are happy to report that Duzzy tolerated the anesthesia necessary for the x-ray procedure very well. He is eating and slowly getting stronger while the antibiotics are taking care of the pneumonia.

Duzzy, sea lion, marine mammal center
Veterinarians at The Marine Mammal Center used diagnostic tools to learn why Duzzy was ill. He had pneumonia.
© Ingrid Overgard - The Marine Mammal Center



We are hopeful that he will make a full recovery and be able to return to his ocean home soon.

How To... Get Into The Latest Hair Color Craze!

Hair chalking is an easy, quick and inexpensive way to add temporary color to your hair. You can do it yourself without making a big commitment.
David John, master stylist and colorist at the Serge Normant at John Frieda Salon in Los Angeles, offers these hair chalking tips.

Step 1: Buy your chalk

John says that you can buy inexpensive non-oil-based pastels at Michael's for $5 or spend $60 if you really want to splurge. All you need other than the chalk is a water bottle, protective gloves, towels and a flat iron.
Step 2: Prep your hair

Step 2: Prep your hair

Make sure to wet the hair first so the color will attach to it. However if you’re blonde, do not wet the hair before chalking unless you want the color to stay in longer.
Step 3: Add the color

Step 3: Add the color

Apply to the chalk to the strand of hair in a downward motion, twist the hair as you chalk. You can try for a fun ombre look, or just do a couple strands.
Step 4: Let it dry

Step 4: Let it dry

While John says that you can blowdry your hair, others recommend air drying so that you don't blow off the chalk.
Step 5: Set the color

Step 5: Set the color

Seal the color in with a flat iron or a curling iron to add waves. Apply hair spray as a final step.

Step 6: Wash it out when you are ready

The color generally will only last one shampoo; however, if the hair is more porous, such as color-treated blonde hair, it can last a couple shampoos. You can use a clarifying shampoo or dish soap to remove the color more quickly -- both have more detergent. Don’t use dish soap on your whole head, just on the strands that have been colored.

tip

If you want something brighter, you can apply white chalk first and then go over it with the color you want to make it pop.

Hair chalking don'ts

John also offers these cautions when hair chalking.
  • Don’t apply the chalk with any wax or product in your hair.
  • Don’t use water on blonde hair if you don’t want the color to last.
  • Wear protective clothing when applying and sleep on an old pillow case as the color will transfer.
  • Don’t try this near the water/beach or on a rainy day.

Hair chalking tips for your hair color

  • Blonde -- Blondes can have a lot of fun with hair chalk, but they shouldn't wet their hair first. Read these tips on how to chalk blonde hair.
  • Brown -- Brunettes can use any color hair chalk. With lighter brown hair, the color will be more intense. Read these tips on how to chalk brown hair.
  • Red -- Redheads can chalk their hair, too. They just need to pick the right colors of chalk. Read these tips on how to chalk red hair.
  • Black -- Those women with black hair need to pick bright, vibrant shades of chalk. Read these tips on how to chalk black hair.
Watch our video on how to chalk your hair below.
Images courtesy of David John of the Serge Normant at John Frieda Salon