Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Conservation Crossroads: Extinction or Recovery?


In the middle of the 20th century, Americans looked around them and saw that something was terribly wrong. Species of plants and animals – even some as beloved as the bald eagle, America’s national symbol – were disappearing. At that point in our history, we determined that we have a responsibility to future generations to conserve our natural heritage, and in 1973, Congress passed the Endangered Species Act (ESA) – a law that has prevented the extinction of hundreds of species of plants and animals, and set many on successful paths to recovery.
But 40 years later, wildlife is once again at a crossroads, and the need to speed up recovery efforts could not be more urgent.  We must put the majority of protected species on the path to recovery before they slip further toward extinction. Constant congressional attacks attempt to undermine the ESA’s authority or cut its funding to a point where the program can no longer function.  And the impacts of climate change are putting more and more species in need of ESA protections.
We need more people to stand up and take action to move imperiled wildlife closer to recovery. As part of this campaign, you can:
  • Help convince legislators to support policies to combat climate change
  • Fight attempts to weaken the Endangered Species Act
  • Educate decision-makers about actions they can take to renew the nation’s commitment to saving imperiled wildlife 
When they passed the Endangered Species Act, our nation’s leader realized we were at a crossroads, and they chose the path of recovery. Now, once again, two roads are before us and the one we choose will define our nation for decades to come.
Read more about the history of the ESA, and the choices America has made to protect its wildlife. 


Update: Charges Filed in 3-State Dog Fighting Raid as Dogs Receive Much-Needed Care Wednesday, April 3, 2013 - 4:15pm

Update: Charges Filed in 3-State Dog Fighting Raid as Dogs Receive Much-Needed Care
In late March, the ASPCA played a critical role in a three-state dog fighting raid that resulted in the rescue of nearly 100 animals. A few weeks after this intricately coordinated effort to rescue dogs in Texas, Missouri and Kansas went off without a hitch, we’re able to update you on the dogs and the dog fighters.
The Victims
When we found these dogs, many were doomed to live their whole lives tethered by heavy chains—and on the day of the raid, many were left outside to suffer through a blizzard. Now, says ASPCA Vice President of Field Investigations and Response Tim Rickey, they’re living in an entirely different world.
When the dogs arrived at our temporary shelter, our veterinary professionals, led by the ASPCA’s Dr. Sarah Kirk, examined them quickly and thoroughly. Some dogs needed immediate care, while others require ongoing treatment which they are now receiving from ASPCA and local veterinarians.
An ASPCA behaviorist will be on the ground at the shelter throughout this operation, and while the dogs stay in our clean and spacious shelter, they will benefit from behavioral enrichment programs that incorporate toys, games and lots of fun interactions with people. The dogs will have regular access to one of several large exercise playpens, where they’ll get to play with our responders and burn off excess doggy energy.
“Every day,” Rickey says, “we’re focusing on taking care of these animals and providing the best environment that we can for them.”
The Suspects
The ASPCA continues to work to collect evidence and provide other support to law enforcement, working to ensure dog fighters pay for harming these animal victims. The charges are just starting to roll in:
Last week Pete Davis Jr. and Melvin L. Robinson, both of Kansas City, Kansas, were each charged in federal court with one count of transporting animals for participation in an animal fighting venture in interstate commerce. If convicted, they face up to five years in federal prison and a possible fine of up to $250,000.
“The case is not over yet—there’s still a lot of work to be done on the investigation side,” says Rickey, adding that he hopes to see more arrests in relation to this raid.
The ASPCA had been assisting the FBI, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Missouri State Highway Patrol and other law enforcement agencies with the planning of this large-scale raid since November 2012. ASPCA Blood Sports Director Terry Mills provided his expertise to help these agencies maximize the operation’s impact. Our next steps: continuing to provide top-notch care for these animals and working with authorities to secure the right to place dogs in loving homes.
If you’ve given to the ASPCA recently, from the bottom of our hearts: thank you. This raid is an enormous undertaking and a huge commitment, but we are dedicated to being there for animal victims of cruelty whenever they need us. If you haven’t yet given lately, please consider doing so today. On behalf of animals across the country, thank you!
0 Comments
Add new comm

5 Surprising Genetically Modified Foods Leaving aside the question of whether they're good or bad for a moment, what exactly are GMOs, and which foods are they in? —By Maggie Caldwell | Mon Aug. 5, 2013 3:00 AM PDT 118




Golden rice
GE rice may soon be approved for human consumption. Photo illustration/Photos from IRRI, WIkimedia Commons
By now, you've likely heard about genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the controversy over whether they're the answer to world hunger or the devil incarnate. But for right now, let's leave aside that debate and turn to a more basic question: When you go to the supermarket, do you know which foods are most likely to be—or contain ingredients that are—genetically engineered? A handy FAQ:
So what exactly are genetically modified organisms?
GMOs are plants or animals that have undergone a process wherein scientists alter their genes with DNA from different species of living organisms, bacteria, or viruses to get desired traits such as resistance to disease or tolerance of pesticides.
But haven't farmers been selectively breeding crops to get larger harvests for centuries? How is this any different?
Over at Grist, Nathanael Johnson has a great answer to this question—but in a nutshell: Yes, farmers throughout history have been raising their plants to achieve certain desired traits such as improved taste, yield, or disease resistance. But this kind of breeding still relies on the natural reproductive processes of the organisms, where as genetic engineering involves the addition of foreign genes that would not occur in nature.
Am I eating GMOs?
Probably. Since several common ingredients like corn starch and soy protein are predominantly derived from genetically modified crops, it's pretty hard to avoid GM foods altogether. In fact, GMOs are present in 60 to 70 percent of foods on US supermarket shelves, according to Bill Freese at the Center for Food Safety; the vast majority of processed foods contain GMOs. One major exception is fresh fruits and veggies. The only GM produce you're likely to find is the Hawaiian papaya, a small amount of zucchini and squash, and some sweet corn. No meat, fish, and poultry products approved for direct human consumption are bioengineered at this point, though most of the feed for livestock and fish is derived from GM corn, alfalfa, and other biotech grains. Only organic varieties of these animal products are guaranteed GMO-free feed.
So what are some examples of food that are genetically modified?
1. Papayas: In the 1990s, Hawaiian papaya trees were plagued by the ringspot virus which decimated nearly half the crop in the state. In 1998, scientists developed a transgenic fruit called Rainbow papaya, which is resistant to the virus. Now 77 percent of the crop grown in Hawaii is genetically engineered (GE).
2. Milk: RGBH, or recombinant bovine growth hormone, is a GE variation on a naturally occurring hormone injected into dairy cows to increase milk production. It is banned for milk destined for human consumption in the European Union, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. Many milk brands that are rGBH-free label their milk as such, but as much as 40 percent of our dairy products, including ice cream and cheese, contains the hormone.
3. Corn on the cob: While 90 percent of corn grown in the United States is genetically modified, most of that crop is used for animal feed or ethanol and much of the rest ends up in processed foods. Sweet corn—the stuff that you steam or grill on the barbecue and eat on the cob—was GMO-free until last year when Monsanto rolled out its first GE harvest of sweet corn. While consumers successfully petitioned Whole Foods and Trader Joe's to not carry the variety, Walmart has begun stocking the shelves with it without any label.
4. Squash and zucchini: While the majority of squashes on the market are not GE, approximately 25,000 acres of crookneck, straightneck, and zucchinis have been bioengineered to be virus resistant.
5. "All natural" foods: Be wary of this label if you're trying to avoid GE foods. Right now there is no strict definition of what constitutes a natural food. This could be changing soon as federal court judges recently requested the Food and Drug Administration to determine whether the term can be used to describe foods containing GMOs to help resolve pending class action suits against General Mills, Campbell Soup Co., and the tortilla manufacturer Gruma Corp.
Are there any foods I've heard might be genetically modified—but actually aren't?
1. Potatoes:
In 1995, Monsanto introduced genetically modified potatoes for human consumption, but after pressure from consumers, McDonald's and several other major fast food chains told their French fry suppliers to stop growing GE potatoes. The crop has since been removed from the market.
2. Seedless watermelon: While it would seem plausible that a fruit that produces no seeds has been bioengineered, the seedless watermelon is a hybrid of two separate breeds. It has been nicknamed the "mule of the watermelon world."
3. Salmon: Currently no meat, fish, or egg products are genetically engineered, though a company called Aqua Bounty has an application in with the FDA to approve its GE salmon.
4. Soy milk: While 93 percent of soy grown in the United States is genetically engineered, most major brands of soy milk are GMO-free. Silk, the best-selling soy milk brand in the country, joined the Non-GMO Project in 2010. Many popular tofu brands in the United States also sell GMO-free tofu products.*
5. Rice: A staple food for nearly half the world's population, there are currently no varieties of GM rice approved for human consumption. However, that could soon change. A genetically modified variety called golden rice being developed in the Philippines has been altered to include beta-carotene, a source of vitamin A. Backers are lauding it as a way to alleviate nutrient deficiency for the populations in developing countries.
How about organic foods?
Since the late '90s, USDA organic standards have prohibited any genetically modified ingredients. Originally, the agency tried to include GE foods under the organic umbrella, but it backed down in 2002 after a massive public outcry to save organic standards.
How long have I been eating GE food?
Scientists conducted the first GE food trials the late 1980s, and in 1994, a biotech company called Calgene released the first GMO approved for human consumption: the "Flavr Savr tomato," designed to stay ripe on the vine longer without getting squishy. The product, which Monsanto eventually picked up, flopped, but it paved the way for others: Biotech companies have made billions since with GE corn, soy bean, cotton, and canola.
Aren't food companies required to let me know whether their products contain GMOs?
Not in the United States. Sixty-four developing and developed countries require GMO food labeling, according to Freese at the Center for Food Safety. You may have heard about the recent string of "Right to Know" bills in state assemblies across the country. The bills are aimed to require food companies to label any products that contain genetically modified organisms. Connecticut and Maine recently passed laws that would require food manufacturers to reveal GE ingredients on product packaging, but those laws won't go into effect until other states adopt similar measures. Americans overwhelmingly support such laws, with poll after poll showing that over 90 percent of respondents support mandatory labeling. Biotech companies and the food industry say that such labeling would be expensive and pointless since genetically engineered foods have been declared safe for human consumption.
So if the food is safe, what's all the fuss about them?
First off, not everyone agrees that GMOs are safe to eat, especially over the long term. The European Union remains decidedly skeptical, with very few approved GE crops grown on the continent and mandatory labeling in place for products that contain GMOs. Some scientists fear that GMOs could cause allergies in humans. Others point to the environmental consequences of the farming of GE crops.
How do GMOs affect the environment?
One word: Pesticides. Hundreds of millions of extra pounds of pesticides. The six biggest producers of GE seeds—Monsanto, Syngenta, Dow Agrosciences, BASF, Bayer, and Pioneer (DuPont)—are also the biggest producers of chemical herbicides and insecticides. Monsanto's Roundup Ready crops, for example, are genetically engineered to be immune to herbicide so that farmers can destroy weeds without killing their cash crops. But the process has spawned Roundup resistant weeds, leading farmers to apply greater and greater doses of the chemical or even resort to more toxic methods to battle back the superweeds.
Where can I learn more about GMOs?
Mother Jones' Tom Philpott writes critically about GMOs often. In this 2011 Scientific American piece, Brendan Borrell lays out the pro-GMO case very well. Grist's Nathanael Johnson has written several posts that clarify the basic science behind GE crops, and a New York Times Room for Debate from 2009 offers a pretty good synopsis of the controversy. Food policy wonks might enjoy perusing the Food and Agriculture Organization's page on biotechnology in agriculture; if you're looking for a more entertaining way to educate yourself, a documentary called GMO OMG opens in select theaters this fall.
Clarification: Previously this story stated most tofu sold in the United States is GMO-free. While the top-selling US tofu brand Nasoya and many other major manufacturers in the US have items verified by the Non-GMO Project, this doesn't necessarily encompass all tofu products.

Maggie Caldwell

Senior Editorial Fellow
Maggie Caldwell is a senior editorial fellow at Mother Jones. For more of her stories, click here. RSS |

Thanks for taking action to save the bees. Can you make a donation?


Donate today!

Last winter, more than 31% of honeybee hives in the United States alone collapsed. The bees are dying at an alarming rate. That's why we need your help.

Congress has introduced a bill to help save the bees, but the Agricultural lobby won't stop until they've killed this bill. European countries have already passed a similar law banning bee killing pesticides. Our campaign is working to ensure the Unites States follows suit by pressuring Congress to do the right thing. But we cannot get a ban on these pesticides without your generous financial support.

Bees don't just make honey, they are vital to life on earth. And they need our help. Please support our campaign to protect the bees and our planet by making a donation today.

“Speaking Dog” Can’t Stop Talking to His Rescuers by Laura Simpson August 5, 2013 5:30 pm


Editor’s note: This post is a Care2 favorite, back by popular demand. It was originally posted on March 8, 2013. Enjoy!
Native Bulgarian Antoni Banev was driving through traffic in the city of Sofia recently when he heard the sound, the familiar yelp of another street dog being mowed over by someone in too much of a hurry to slow down and too short on compassion to turn back. One car after another drove over or around the dog left lying in the road, but Antoni is wired differently. He dashed out of his still-running car and knelt on the ground to help the injured dog. Not knowing if he’d be bitten or if there was any hope for this poor creature, Antoni did the only thing his conscience would allow. He carefully laid the dog down in his car and hurried to the veterinary office for help.
Through the thick air in the small examination room, the veterinarian cautioned Antoni that he wasn’t sure there was a strong chance of recovery. And even if surgery could save the dog, who would pay the $400 up front? Antoni did not have $400, but he wasn’t about to let that stop him.
Back at home, Antoni sat in front of his computer and began reaching out to every social networking site he could find. He was sure that someone would help, if only he could make the right connection.
“When I first saw Antoni’s pleas, I knew I had to help,” said Jayne Jones of K9 Rescue Bulgaria. “I could see by the photos of Lucky’s broken little body that he was very seriously injured, yet the look in his eyes was pleading for help. I could not and would not ignore him.”
They Would Rebuild Him
Jayne, together with online friends, raised the $400 that night and the dog, now named Lucky, gently closed his eyes on the surgery table.
There was a little flutter of excitement surrounding Lucky as he pulled through that first operation better than expected. Lucky’s story began to make its way to a larger and larger body of animal lovers, and before long, the next $1,000 was raised for the orthopedic repairs on Lucky’s three broken legs, broken pelvis and fractured spine.  And after a roller coaster of hopes and fears, including a life-threatening infection, rejection of his implants, something changed. Lucky came back to life, and he began to showcase a very special aspect of his individuality.
“We call him the ‘speaking dog,” said veterinarian Dr. Maria Savova of Nova Clinic in Sofia. “In the morning when we open the clinic, he is so happy to see us, that he just cries and whimpers with delight.”
As the day goes on, Lucky just keeps on talking. While he’s eating his wet food. While he’s eating his meat. While he’s palling around with his new best friend Millie. And sometimes in his sleep. Lucky simply likes to “talk.”
While some dogs are more prone to frequent vocalizations, there is speculation that Lucky’s stem from the relief that pours through his body these days. He no longer lives alone in the cold. He doesn’t suffer attacks by other street dogs. His bones are no longer broken. His back has healed. And, yes, he can now walk again. Though he had to literally get smashed on the ground to extinguish his old life, Lucky has pulled through and looks forward to the experience of becoming a family pet.
“We love him!” Dr. Savova continues. “He can walk without a leash outside. He does not try to run away. He’s quite happy to go back into the clinic after a walk. Lucky loves kids and is extremely clever. He wants to play with everyone and has the most amazing eyes – he looks at us like a human…more than a human.” (Visit K9 Bulgaria’s Facebook page)
Lucky has healed and is looking for a forever home in Europe
Beginnings of Change for 70,000 of Lucky’s Fellow Street Dogs in Sofia
K9 Bulgaria is funding the purchase equipment to help disadvantaged animal shelters and to also fund veterinary training here. In the city of Sofia alone, there are an estimated 70,000 street dogs and the veterinary services available to rescue groups need vast improvement. Spay/neuter is often done poorly, resulting in some terrible deaths, and heartstick euthanasia is still taught in veterinary school. It comes down to a lack of veterinary training and zeroing in on that deficiency will make a monstrous mark on the well-being of generations of animals like Lucky.
This month, the Harmony Fund international animal rescue charity is raising funds to deliver a grant to K9 Bulgaria and to three other rescue teams here. So many Care2 readers have been reaching out to the animals of Bulgaria through this campaign and there’s a palpable feeling of excitement and anticipation from rescuers here who simply can’t get past the fact that so many people, some of them oceans away, care enough to help. To visit this empowering and joyful campaign to help the homeless dogs and cats in Bulgaria, click here.
Related Stories
English Setter Weighs Less than a 2-Year-Old
Mom Could Go to Prison for Being Too Poor to Save Animals
Wrong Turn Leads Hiker to Rescue in the   Mountains

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/speaking-dog-cant-stop-talking-to-his-rescuers.html#ixzz2bCrRh4Jl

2-Year-Old Toddler Has Leg Tattooed June 26, 2013 by Patricia-Anne Tom 15



Two years old might sound a tad bit early to get a tattoo, but don't worry, it was painless. Logan Lansborough recently had artist Michael Joseph paint the character Bubbles from Finding Nemo on his prosthetic right leg, the Huffington Post reports.
Logan was born with congenital absence of the tibia, which required both of his legs to be amputated.
To find out why his parents thinks it's a good idea to decorate his prosthetic leg, read the whole story at the Huffington Post.

8 Pool Party Pastas the Kids Will Love! June 6, 2013